An inspector with drawings in front of scaffolding

A standard for the openings package, and a review that proves it on a given job.

In development

Firm practice and package quality belong to nobody.

Product standards are settled, and individual credentials are settled. Before an openings package goes to bid, nobody outside the project team reads it, and the owner absorbs whatever was missed.

The Openings Quality Program pairs a published standard with independent accredited practitioners and a review that leaves the owner with a document to keep.

Part one

Accredited Practice

A published practice standard for independent openings specification, and accreditation of firms against it. The standard covers disclosure of manufacturer relationships, conflict rules, a documented internal review checklist, professional liability coverage and annual education hours.

Part two

Project Review

An accredited reviewer from outside the project team reads the openings package before bid: the door schedule, the hardware sets, the frame elevations, and the coordination between electrified hardware and the access control design. The reviewer issues a findings report the owner keeps, and the architect can name the program in the openings section.

Independence

The firewall is written in from the start.

A mark that certifies independent practice has to stay independent of the manufacturers whose products accredited firms specify. The governance separates the two from the beginning: review and accreditation decisions sit apart from membership.

Courses already running under the alliance's banner will teach the practice standard, so accreditation arrives with a curriculum behind it. Pilot reviews come first, because findings from real packages settle most of what any program guesses at.

Talk to the alliance